Loading...
Loading...
All product recalls associated with Medtronic Inc..
Total Recalls
300
Past Year
25
Class I (Serious)
0
Most Recent
Nov 2025
Data from FDA, USDA, CPSC, and NHTSA public records. Recall counts vary by company size, industry, and reporting practices. Always check official sources for current information.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Potential for manufacturing defect. Weld crack led to devices failing at the leak check step in manufacturing.
Due to a software issue, there is the potential for a missing digit, letter, or decimal in either the "distance to target" or "tip stop point" display during navigation.
There is a potential for sterile package breach.
During internal review of Polaris battery assembly data from the HiPot operation, a test systems engineer noticed that some batteries had gone through the High Potential test twice. This was able to occur because the test screen did not prevent retesting after a failure. Some batteries were therefore retested and passed.
Their is the potential that the percutaneous pin may have a cross-pin that may render the pin unable to fit into tap cap, or too tight to remove.
Their is the potential that the percutaneous pin may have a cross-pin that may render the pin unable to fit into tap cap, or too tight to remove.
Some sensors may have a glucose oxidase (GOX) layer thickness outside of specification (5.5 to 9.2 m). A non-conforming GOX layer thickness could impact sensor function (sensor glucose value) or loss of sensor function due to the sensor layer being too thin. The potential impact resulting from this issue ranges from user inconvenience to over/under delivery of insulin, possibly resulting in hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, if the sensor glucose values are affected. The issue was identified by the manufacturing team during the execution of Filmetrics Measurement for a Guardian Sensor lot.
Firm received reports of customers experiencing noise from the NIM System, lead-off or high impedance issues, or loss of/intermittent nerve monitoring,
It may create the potential for amplified noise and/or overall signal reduction of the ICM, which may interfere with intended recordings of heart rhythms. This noise pattern is different from occasional noise due to device position/migration, patient activity, or external electromagnetic interference.